Jail medical care lawsuit moves forward after inmate's hand injury went undertreated.
Justin Davis v. Judy Mabry, et al.
Status and record
Your position
Do you support this decision?
An advisory read. Your position on a ruling is citizen opinion; it does not form a citizen mandate and is never a legal appeal.
Civitus citizens
Take a position above to see how verified Civitus citizens are weighing in. Positions stay sealed until you have one of your own.
The Civitus brief
AI analysis
Plain English
Jail medical care lawsuit moves forward after inmate's hand injury went undertreated.
Why it matters
In Justin Davis v. Judy Mabry, et al., the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky partially granted and partially denied a motion for summary judgment brought by Southern Health Partners and several jail medical staff members. The case centers on whether jail medical personnel were deliberately indifferent to Davis's serious hand injuries while he was held at the Boyd County Detention Center in 2021. Because the court granted the motion only in part, some of Davis's claims will proceed to further litigation.
Who it affects
- Their staff
- Adequately treated
What happens next
Current
Decision issued Sep 3, 2026
Next
Possible rehearing
Parties can ask the same court to reconsider. Then: possible appeal to the circuit court.
View possible path
- Decision issued Sep 3, 2026
- Possible rehearingParties can ask the same court to reconsider.
- Possible appeal to the circuit court
Citizens vs Court
Civitus citizens
Sealed
Take a counted position to open the tally.
District court
Decision issued
Sep 3, 2026
Take a position above to open the comparison.
A comparison of public sentiment with the ruling. Courts are not subject to a citizen mandate, and judges are not elected representatives.
Take action
Courts decide cases; Congress can respond with legislation. Telling your representative is the civic lever here.
Public discussion
Add a tag
Citizen opinion on this ruling, not a rehearing of the case. Similar opinions on this case can open a solution poll.
3 similar opinions open a solution poll
Loading opinions
Deeper context
Long-form analysis, legal background, and source material
Read analysisAnalysis · Source
DEEPER READ
Justin Davis accidentally shot himself in the left hand in March 2021, requiring two surgeries and leaving him with six stabilizing pins in his hand when he was discharged from the hospital. He missed his follow-up appointments with his surgeon and did not see any medical professional for nearly eight weeks after discharge. When he was arrested and booked into the Boyd County Detention Center in May 2021, jail staff noted visible pain, swelling, and protruding pins in his hand. While in the jail's assessment cell, Davis fell from a bunk and further injured his hand. By the time he received an X-ray later that day, all of the pins had been removed from his hand. Jail staff placed him on suicide watch, claiming he had self-mutilated. Eleven days after the fall, the jail's medical director, APRN Karen Bennett-Baker, examined Davis and found serious signs of deterioration including finger discoloration suggesting poor circulation, significant muscle loss in his left arm, and inability to use his hand for basic tasks. She prescribed a muscle relaxant, ordered accommodations, and referred him to a neurologist, but did not contact his original surgeon because Davis had missed prior follow-up appointments. The defendants, including the private medical contractor Southern Health Partners and several individual medical staff members, moved for summary judgment, arguing they were not deliberately indifferent to Davis's medical needs. The court granted the motion in part and denied it in part, meaning some claims were dismissed while others survived and will continue. The source text does not specify which particular claims were dismissed or which were allowed to proceed, so those details are not included here. The central legal question is whether the medical care provided to Davis at the jail met the constitutional standard required under the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendment, which prohibits deliberate indifference to serious medical needs of people in government custody. The partial denial of summary judgment means a factfinder will need to evaluate at least some of the remaining claims.
CITATION AND RECORD
Record source: CourtListener
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY NORTHERN DIVISION AT ASHLAND CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-25-DLB-EBA JUSTIN DAVIS PLAINTIFF v. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JUDY MABRY, et al. DEFENDANTS * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * I. INTRODUCTION This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Summary Judgment from Defendants Southern Health Partners, Inc., Karen Bennett Baker, Latrisha Ferguson, Judy Mabry, and Norah McGlone (Doc. # 60). Plaintiff Justin Davis having filed his Response in Opposition (Doc. # 64)1 and Defendants having filed their Reply (Doc. # 66), the matter is now ripe for the Court’s review. For the following reasons, Defendants’ Motion is granted in part and denied in part. II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This case stems from a self-inflicted hand injury sustained by Plaintiff Justin Davis on March 1, 2021. At all times relevant to this case, Davis was a resident of Ashland, Kentucky. (Doc. # 1 ¶ 3). On March 1, 2021, Davis suffered a gunshot wound to his left hand when he reached into a couch at an acquaintance’s house and accidentally 1 Davis filed two Responses with identical substantive arguments. (See Docs. # 63 and 64). However, in Docket Entry 64, Davis attached a series of exhibits that relate to his Response. (See Docs. # 64-1 through 64-25). For the sake of completeness of the record, the Court will refer to Docket Entry 64 as the operative Response in this Order. discharged the firearm into his hand. (Doc. # 60-3 at 50:13–51:6). He was rushed to the hospital at the University of Kentucky (“UK”) in Lexington, Kentucky, where Dr. Morgan Brgoch performed a four-hour emergency surgery on Davis’s left hand to repair “a fracture and dislocation of several of the hand bones.” (Id. at 52:13–53:12; Doc. # 60-4 at 30:17– 23). In the first surgery, Dr. Brgoch reduced the swelling in Davis’s hand and put the bones back in their regular place with several pins. (Doc. # 60-4 at 37:13–38:25). Two days later, Davis had a second, less intensive surgery on his hand. (Id. at 41:16–43:19). Davis was discharged from the hospital on March 5, 2021. (Doc. # 60-3 at 57:11– 16). He left with six pins in his hand to stabilize the bones and nerves after the surgeries. (Doc. # 60-4 at 53:3–22; Doc. # 64-10). He was given first-aid materials and instructions on how to keep his wound clean. (Doc. # 60-3 at 60:9–16). He was also given a follow- up appointment with Dr. Brgoch “roughly four weeks” after his discharge. (Id. at 57:11– 19). However, Davis did not attend the follow-up appointment, citing car troubles on his way to Lexington. (Id. at 58:10–59:22). He claims he rescheduled the appointment for a future date, but he did not attend the rescheduled appointment either. (Id.). Further, Davis said he did not have his wound checked by any other medical professional between his discharge from the UK hospital on March 5, 2021 and May 9, 2021. (Id. at 63:14–25). Dr. Brgoch testified that he did not see Davis again until 2022. (Doc. # 60-4 at 58:15– 17). Nearly eight weeks after being discharged from the hospital, Davis was arrested on May 9, 2021 pursuant to a bench warrant issued the night of his injury. (Doc. # 60-3 at 35:3–21, 66:14–18). Prior to being taken to the Boyd County Detention Center (“BCDC”), Davis was taken to King’s Daughters Medical Center (“KDMC”) in Ashland for medical clearance. (Id. at 69:23–70:6; see also Doc. # 64-12). He was shortly cleared for booking, although his attending doctor did note his “surgical hardware” in his left hand, as well as mild swelling. (Doc. # 64-12). Davis was then taken to BCDC for booking. On his initial screening form dated May 10, 2021, BCDC staff reported that Davis was visibly suffering from pain in his hand from a gunshot wound. (Doc. # 64-17). Davis reported to staff that he “struggle[d] getting dressed, showered, undressed” due to his swollen hand. (Id.). While he was in the assessment cell, Davis “notic[ed] the pins and things hanging out of [his] hand[,]” which made him call for medical assistance. (Doc. # 60-3 at 93:18–94:8). On May 11, 2021, Davis fell from the bunk in the assessment cell and further injured his hand. (Id. at 94:17–95:22). Several inmates in the assessment cell alerted deputies of Davis’s injuries. (Id. at 99:2–16, 100:11–24). He was taken to the medical observation room, where jail staff noted he was unable to move his arm or wrist and he had dried blood near his pin sites. (Doc. # 64-17). Staff also noted he had an increased edema, but no changes in color to his hand. (Id.). Davis had an X-ray later that day. (Doc. # 60-3 at 103:2–23). By the time he had his X-ray, Davis had “worked out” all the pins that were previously in his hand. (Id.). Davis alleges that deputies claimed he had “self-mutilated” by taking the pins out of his hand, and he was placed on suicide watch that same day. (Id. at 100:11–24; Doc. # 60-5 at 21:18–22:10). In conjunction with his May 11 medical visits, BCDC staff notified APRN Karen Bennett-Baker, BCDC’s medical director, that Davis would need an outside appointment, which she confirmed via text message on or about May 12, 2021. (Doc. # 60-7 at 34:23–35:25; see also Doc. # 64- 20). Eleven days after his fall, Davis saw Bennett-Baker in person on May 22, 2021 for an examination. (Id. at 22:11–22). She observed discoloration of one of his fingers and inability to straighten his fingers, which she attributed to “some type of nerve injury.” (Id. at 23:5–18). She further observed that Davis’s left arm had experienced significant atrophy and was much smaller than his right arm. (Id. at 23:18–24:6). She further found that Davis’s left middle finger was “turning a gray color” which Baker-Bennett concluded meant it had poor circulation. (Id. at 25:4–13). Davis told Baker-Bennett that he could not use his left hand “for any kind of task” including lifting, dressing himself, bathing himself, or anything involving fine motor coordination. (Id. at 25:11–18). Bennett-Baker testified that Davis told her he removed the pins from his hand because he was “angry that he was in jail” and “angry that he was hurting.” (Id. at 24:18–25:3). Baker-Bennett testified that her immediate concern, based on what Davis told her and his UK medical records, was that he had a brachial plexus injury in his left shoulder that was impacting his mobility. (Id. at 26:5–27:3). She expressed concern that Davis could become permanently disabled if he did not receive prompt treatment. (Id. at 34:10– 35:17). Based on her findings, she prescribed Davis a muscle relaxant to help with his shoulder and hand pain. (Id. at 28:12–23). She further ordered that Davis should be placed in a low bunk, given an arm sling, and dressed in a two-piece uniform to help with his limitations. (Doc. # 64-21). Baker-Bennett also ordered that Davis be seen by a neurologist. (Id.; Doc. # 60-5 at 29:10–16). However, she did not follow up with Davis’s hand surgeon, Dr. Brgoch, because “[Davis] had not kept his follow-up appointments” and “a lot of the
Sources
- Official opinionPrimary record
Public record. Timeline facts only; no accusation of wrongdoing. Advisory citizen opinion does not form a citizen mandate.