Administrative Leave for Workforce Realignment and Other Purposes
OPM finalizes rules clarifying when federal agencies can place employees on paid administrative leave during workforce downsizing, deferred resignation programs, and layoffs.
Public comment window: 22 days left.
Status and record
Your position
Do you support this rule?
An advisory read. Presidents and agencies are not bound by citizen positions; this does not form a citizen mandate.
Civitus citizens
Take a position above to see how verified Civitus citizens are weighing in. Positions stay sealed until you have one of your own.
The Civitus brief
AI analysis
Plain English
OPM finalizes rules clarifying when federal agencies can place employees on paid administrative leave during workforce downsizing, deferred resignation programs, and layoffs.
Why it matters
The Office of Personnel Management has issued a final rule updating how federal agencies may use administrative leave, particularly in connection with deferred resignation programs and workforce reduction initiatives. The rule clarifies the circumstances under which agencies can grant paid leave during reduction-in-force notice periods and sets guidelines for when employees may withdraw resignations submitted under deferred resignation programs. This action formalizes policies that affect the rights and status of federal employees during major workforce changes.
Who it affects
Personnel Management Office
What happens next
Current
Signed
Published Oct 19, 2026.
Next
Takes effect Nov 18, 2026
Public comment window: 22 days left.
View full path
- ProposedPublished Oct 19, 2026
- SignedStatus: Signed · Published Oct 19, 2026
- In effectEffective Nov 18, 2026
- ChallengedNo challenge record stored beyond status. See the Federal Register source for litigation history.
- ClosedLast effective date Nov 18, 2026
Citizens vs Agency
Civitus citizens
Sealed
Take a counted position to open the tally.
Personnel Management Office
Signed
Effective Nov 18, 2026
Take a position above to open the comparison.
A comparison of public sentiment with the rule. Agencies weigh formal comments in rulemaking; this Civitus tally is not one of them.
Take action
Formal comments go to the agency through the Federal Register, in your own name.
Public discussion
Add a tag
Citizen opinion on this action, distinct from the position above. Similar opinions on this action can open a solution poll.
3 similar opinions open a solution poll
Loading opinions
Deeper context
Long-form analysis, legal background, and source material
Read analysisAnalysis · Official text · Sage perspective
DEEPER READ
This final rule from the Office of Personnel Management amends existing regulations to more clearly define appropriate uses of administrative leave, which is paid leave granted to federal employees without charge to their personal leave balances. Specifically, the rule addresses scenarios arising from large-scale workforce restructuring efforts, including programs where employees are offered the option to resign while continuing to receive pay for a period, sometimes called deferred resignation or 'fork in the road' programs. The rule directly addresses two key procedural questions. First, it clarifies when an agency may place an employee on administrative leave during the notice period required before a reduction in force, which is a formal process for laying off federal workers. Second, it establishes guidelines for when agencies may accept or deny an employee's request to withdraw a resignation submitted under a deferred resignation program, giving agencies clearer authority to hold employees to their resignations in certain circumstances. The legal basis for this rule flows from OPM's statutory authority to regulate the federal civilian workforce under Title 5 of the United States Code, which grants OPM broad authority over personnel management policies across the executive branch. The rule operates within the framework of existing civil service protections, though critics have raised questions about whether some workforce reduction programs that rely on administrative leave adequately honor those protections. The employees most directly affected are federal civilian workers across executive branch agencies, particularly those who participated in or were offered deferred resignation programs that were rolled out in early 2025. Agencies themselves are also affected, as they now have clearer regulatory guidance on managing employees during workforce realignment. The rule does not apply to military personnel or most employees of agencies outside the executive branch. The rule takes effect as a final rule, meaning the public comment period has closed and OPM has incorporated responses into this version. Implementation is immediate upon the rule's effective date as published in the Federal Register, and agencies are expected to apply these standards to ongoing and future workforce realignment activities.
AS PUBLISHED
The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is issuing a final rule to amend its regulations governing administrative leave for workforce realignment and other purposes. This final rule more fully addresses the appropriate uses of administrative leave, including use in connection with deferred resignation programs and other workforce realignment initiatives, and for other purposes. The final rule also clarifies when an agency may provide administrative leave during a reduction-in-force notice period and accept or deny an employee's request to withdraw a resignation in the context of a deferred resignation program.
THE SAGE'S PERSPECTIVE
AI analysis
This rule has direct implications for hundreds of thousands of federal employees affected by ongoing workforce reduction efforts. It gives agencies clearer authority to manage employee status during layoffs and resignation programs, which could limit some employees' ability to reverse resignation decisions. The rule formalizes practices that have been legally contested, making regulatory clarity a central purpose of the action.
Source: official record
Sources
- Federal Register entryPrimary record
Your stance is citizen opinion; it does not form a citizen mandate. Mandate accountability applies when Congress votes on tracked legislation.