EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP, INC. · FL
💵 SPENDING OPINION
OPC P&CD CONTRACT 2 REFERENCE SOLICITATION NUMBER HSCG23-12-R-OPC0001
Department of Homeland Security → $1.6B to EASTERN SHIPBUILDING GROUP, INC.
Judge how your money was spent, worth it or wasteful, on the record.
Be the first to put your opinion on the record.
✦ WHY THIS MONEY IS BEING SPENT
WHAT IS THIS?
This is a contract worth approximately 1.6 billion dollars awarded by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to Eastern Shipbuilding Group, Inc., a Florida-based company, to build Offshore Patrol Cutters (OPCs) for the United States Coast Guard. The company will design and construct these large patrol ships that the Coast Guard uses to carry out missions at sea.
WHY WAS THIS FUNDED?
The contract is tied to the Coast Guard's Offshore Patrol Cutter program, which is a long-running effort authorized by Congress to modernize and replace aging Coast Guard vessels. The solicitation number suggests this is the second major contract under that acquisition program.
WHAT PUBLIC PROBLEM IS IT TRYING TO SOLVE?
The U.S. Coast Guard relies on ships to patrol coastal and offshore waters, conduct search and rescue operations, stop drug trafficking, and enforce maritime laws. Many of the older ships in the Coast Guard fleet are aging and need to be replaced to keep these missions running safely and effectively.
WHO BENEFITS?
American maritime workers at Eastern Shipbuilding Group's facilities in Florida benefit directly through jobs in shipbuilding and manufacturing. More broadly, the U.S. Coast Guard and the American public benefit from updated vessels that support national security, border enforcement, and safety at sea.
WHAT ARE THE RISKS?
Large, long-term shipbuilding contracts like this one carry risks including cost overruns, construction delays, and changes in design requirements that can drive up the final price. Oversight is critical given that the contract spans over a decade and involves complex, first-of-class ship construction.
WHAT HAPPENS IF FUNDING IS REMOVED?
If this contract were cancelled, the Coast Guard would likely be left without planned replacement vessels, forcing it to continue operating older ships that may be more costly to maintain and less capable. Shipyard workers and the surrounding Florida community could also face significant job losses.
ARGUMENTS FOR
- •The contract directly supports national security by giving the Coast Guard modern ships needed to carry out critical missions including drug interdiction, search and rescue, and maritime law enforcement.
- •Building these ships in the United States supports domestic manufacturing jobs and strengthens the American shipbuilding industry.
- •Replacing aging Coast Guard cutters now may reduce long-term costs compared to continually repairing outdated vessels.
ARGUMENTS AGAINST
- •Shipbuilding contracts of this scale have a history of cost overruns and delays, meaning the final price to taxpayers could end up significantly higher than 1.6 billion dollars.
- •A contract running from 2014 to 2027 spans many years, making it harder for Congress and the public to review whether taxpayer money is being spent wisely.
- •Some critics may argue that the Coast Guard's patrol needs could be met through alternative approaches, such as upgrading existing vessels, at a lower overall cost.
✦ SPENDING TIMELINE
Citizen opinionWritten opinion on whether this spending is appropriate · not a duplicate of the Worth It / Wasteful vote or trade data
Is this spending appropriate?
Similar opinions on this spending record can open a solution poll. Context: The U.S. Coast Guard relies on ships to patrol coastal and offshore waters, conduct search and rescue operations, stop drug trafficking, and enforce maritime la
ENTITY-LOCAL CLUSTER
No clustering opinions yet on this item. 3 similar voices (cosine ≥ 0.80) open a solution poll.
Loading opinions…
Your stance is citizen opinion; it does not form a citizen mandate. Mandate accountability applies when Congress votes on tracked legislation.