WHY WAS THIS FUNDED?

This award was made possible by U.S. government efforts to assist Afghans who worked with or were at risk after the U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021. The Department of State oversees programs that help relocate vulnerable Afghans, including those who assisted U.S. forces.

WHAT PUBLIC PROBLEM IS IT TRYING TO SOLVE?

After the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021, tens of thousands of Afghans faced serious danger, especially those who had worked with the U.S. military or government. This contract was meant to help manage the complex logistics of moving those people to safety.

WHO BENEFITS?

Afghan refugees and at-risk individuals seeking relocation benefit directly from this contract. U.S. government staff coordinating the relocation effort also benefit from the organizational and logistical support the company provides.

WHAT ARE THE RISKS?

A contract of this size, lasting three years, carries risks of cost overruns, lack of transparency, and difficulty verifying that services were delivered effectively. The contract type is listed as unknown, which limits the public's ability to assess how spending is being controlled.

WHAT HAPPENS IF FUNDING IS REMOVED?

If this contract were cancelled, the logistical coordination needed to process and relocate Afghan individuals could slow down or stop entirely. People waiting to be relocated could face longer delays and increased risk while awaiting safety.

ARGUMENTS FOR

• •The U.S. has a strong moral and strategic interest in protecting Afghans who risked their lives helping American forces and diplomats.
• •Organized logistical support helps the government process large numbers of people more efficiently and safely than improvised alternatives.
• •Honoring commitments to Afghan allies strengthens U.S. credibility with future partners and allies around the world.

ARGUMENTS AGAINST

• •A $354.5 million contract with an unknown contract type raises questions about oversight and whether taxpayers are getting the best value.
• •Critics argue that the scale and pace of Afghan relocation efforts have not always been well-managed, suggesting the money may not be spent efficiently.
• •Some argue that relocation programs should be subject to stricter vetting requirements before large contracts are awarded, to ensure national security safeguards are in place.