Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
Who got paid, how much, for what, and whether it is defensible. Citizen opinion on the record, not a mandate.
Status and record
NEW TO - EHRM PMO IO SUPPORT
$859.7M · DELIVERY ORDER · Department of Veterans Affairs · NJ
FEDERAL SPENDING · CITIZEN OPINION
Was this federal payment to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC worth it?
$859.7M · Department of Veterans Affairs to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC
Be the first to put your opinion on the record.
What this award is
AI analysis
This is a delivery order contract where the Department of Veterans Affairs is paying Booz Allen Hamilton, a large consulting and technology firm, up to $859.7 million to provide support for the VA's Electronic Health Record Modernization (EHRM) Program Management Office (PMO). In plain terms, Booz Allen Hamilton will help manage and support the VA's major project to modernize how veterans' health records are stored, shared, and used.
DEEPER CONTEXTAnalysis · Risks · Arguments
WHY THIS MONEY IS BEING SPENT
WHY WAS THIS FUNDED?
The VA has been legally directed by Congress to modernize its outdated electronic health record system to improve veteran care and align with the Department of Defense's health record system. This contract provides the program management, information technology, and consulting support needed to carry out that large and complex effort.
WHAT PUBLIC PROBLEM IS IT TRYING TO SOLVE?
The VA's old electronic health record system has been fragmented and difficult to use, sometimes leading to gaps in care for veterans when they move between VA facilities or transition from military to veteran care. Modernizing this system is intended to make veterans' medical records more complete, accessible, and reliable for the doctors and staff who treat them.
WHO BENEFITS?
Veterans who receive health care through the VA system are the primary intended beneficiaries, as better health record systems can improve the quality and coordination of their care. Booz Allen Hamilton employees working on the project also benefit through jobs, and VA clinical and administrative staff benefit from improved tools.
Plain-language reading generated from the USASpending award record. Not legal or financial advice.
RISKS AND TRADEOFFS
WHAT ARE THE RISKS?
A contract of this size carries significant risk of cost overruns, schedule delays, and scope creep, especially since the broader EHRM program has already faced scrutiny from government watchdogs for going over budget and missing deadlines. Ensuring that taxpayer money is being spent effectively and that the contractor delivers promised results on time is a key accountability concern.
WHAT HAPPENS IF FUNDING IS REMOVED?
If this contract were cancelled, the VA's effort to modernize its electronic health record system would likely slow down significantly or stall, potentially leaving veterans and VA staff stuck with older, less effective record-keeping tools. It could also disrupt work already underway and require the VA to find alternative support, which could cost additional time and money.
FOR AND AGAINST
ARGUMENTS FOR
- •Modernizing the VA's health record system is widely seen as critical to improving care for millions of veterans, and professional program management support helps such a large and complex project stay on track.
- •Aligning VA health records with the Department of Defense's system can reduce dangerous gaps in care when service members transition to veteran status, which could directly save lives.
- •The VA lacks the in-house staffing and specialized expertise to manage a project of this scale alone, making contractor support a practical and common approach for large government technology programs.
ARGUMENTS AGAINST
- •The broader EHRM program has already been criticized by government oversight offices for cost overruns and implementation problems, raising questions about whether additional large contracts will produce better results.
- •Nearly $860 million is an enormous sum for management and support services, and critics may argue the VA should invest more directly in its own permanent staff rather than relying heavily on outside consultants.
- •Large, multi-year contracts with a single firm can reduce competition and make it harder for the government to hold the contractor accountable if performance falls short.
SPENDING TIMELINE
Add a tag
Written opinion on whether this spending is appropriate · not a duplicate of the Worth It / Wasteful vote or spending record. Similar opinions on this spending record can open a solution poll.
3 similar opinions open a solution poll
Loading opinions
Your stance is citizen opinion; it does not form a citizen mandate. Mandate accountability applies when Congress votes on tracked legislation.