Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Who got paid, how much, for what, and whether it is defensible. Citizen opinion on the record, not a mandate.
Status and record
IGF::CT::IGF SOFTWARE AND ENGINEERING II CONTRACT. UNDER THIS CONTRACT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) TECHNICAL SUPPORT TO THE APPLIED ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORATE (AETD) FACILITIES AND ASSOCIATED DESKTOPS, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, SUPPORT OF INFORMATION SYSTEM SECURITY OFFICERS, SYSTEM ADMINISTRATORS, HELPDESK SUPPORT, FLIGHT SOFTWARE ENGINEERS, SOFTWARE SYSTEMS ENGINEERS, AND NETWORK ENGINEERS.
$388.5M · DEFINITIVE CONTRACT · National Aeronautics and Space Administration · MD
FEDERAL SPENDING · CITIZEN OPINION
Was this federal payment to ARCTIC SLOPE TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. worth it?
$388.5M · National Aeronautics and Space Administration to ARCTIC SLOPE TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.
Be the first to put your opinion on the record.
Sage explainer has not populated for this award yet.
SPENDING TIMELINE
Add a tag
Written opinion on whether this spending is appropriate · not a duplicate of the Worth It / Wasteful vote or spending record. Similar opinions on this spending record can open a solution poll.
3 similar opinions open a solution poll
Loading opinions
Your stance is citizen opinion; it does not form a citizen mandate. Mandate accountability applies when Congress votes on tracked legislation.