LEIDOS, INC. · WV
💵 SPENDING OPINION
RESEARCH SUPPORT SERVICES (RSS)
Department of Energy → $1.0B to LEIDOS, INC.
Judge how your money was spent, worth it or wasteful, on the record.
Be the first to put your opinion on the record.
✦ WHY THIS MONEY IS BEING SPENT
WHAT IS THIS?
This is a contract worth up to $1 billion awarded by the DOE (Department of Energy) to Leidos, Inc., a large technology and science services company. Leidos will provide research support services, meaning they will assist DOE with technical, scientific, or operational work over a roughly 10-year period.
WHY WAS THIS FUNDED?
The DOE regularly hires outside contractors to support its research missions, which can include managing scientific facilities, providing technical expertise, or handling data and analysis tasks. Additional program information is not available regarding the specific legal authority or program behind this award.
WHAT PUBLIC PROBLEM IS IT TRYING TO SOLVE?
The DOE conducts research in areas like nuclear energy, environmental cleanup, and national security, but it often needs outside help to carry out complex technical work. This contract is meant to ensure that qualified experts and support staff are available to keep that research moving forward.
WHO BENEFITS?
Workers employed by Leidos on this contract in West Virginia and potentially other locations benefit directly through jobs. The broader public may benefit indirectly if the research support helps advance energy, environmental, or national security goals.
WHAT ARE THE RISKS?
A 10-year, $1 billion contract with an unknown contract type raises questions about how performance will be measured and whether the government is getting good value. Without clear details on the contract structure, it can be harder for the public to know if taxpayer money is being spent efficiently.
WHAT HAPPENS IF FUNDING IS REMOVED?
If this contract were cancelled, the DOE would likely lose access to the research support staff and services Leidos provides, potentially slowing down ongoing scientific or operational work. The agency would need to find replacement contractors or hire its own staff, which could take significant time and cause disruptions.
ARGUMENTS FOR
- •Outsourcing specialized research support to experienced private firms like Leidos can give the DOE access to skilled workers and tools it might not efficiently maintain in-house.
- •A long-term contract provides stability and continuity for important research and operational support work that may span many years.
- •Supporting jobs in West Virginia and elsewhere contributes to local economies and keeps experienced technical workers engaged in federally important projects.
ARGUMENTS AGAINST
- •A $1 billion, 10-year contract with an unknown contract type makes it difficult for taxpayers and oversight officials to evaluate whether the government is getting fair value.
- •Long-term contracts with a single large company can reduce competition and limit the government's ability to switch providers if performance problems arise.
- •The broad title 'Research Support Services' provides little transparency about exactly what work is being done or how success will be measured.
✦ SPENDING TIMELINE
Citizen opinionWritten opinion on whether this spending is appropriate · not a duplicate of the Worth It / Wasteful vote or trade data
Is this spending appropriate?
Similar opinions on this spending record can open a solution poll. Context: The DOE conducts research in areas like nuclear energy, environmental cleanup, and national security, but it often needs outside help to carry out complex techn
ENTITY-LOCAL CLUSTER
No clustering opinions yet on this item. 3 similar voices (cosine ≥ 0.80) open a solution poll.
Loading opinions…
Your stance is citizen opinion; it does not form a citizen mandate. Mandate accountability applies when Congress votes on tracked legislation.