Awarding agency: Department of Transportation
Who got paid, how much, for what, and whether it is defensible. Citizen opinion on the record, not a mandate.
Status and record
TERMINAL FLIGHT DATA MANAGER IGF::OT::IGF
$573.9M · DEFINITIVE CONTRACT · Department of Transportation · DC
FEDERAL SPENDING · CITIZEN OPINION
Was this federal payment to LEIDOS, INC. worth it?
$573.9M · Department of Transportation to LEIDOS, INC.
Be the first to put your opinion on the record.
What this award is
AI analysis
This is a long-term contract where the U.S. Department of Transportation is paying Leidos, Inc. up to about $574 million to manage a system called the Terminal Flight Data Manager, which collects and organizes flight information at airports to help air traffic controllers do their jobs safely.
DEEPER CONTEXTAnalysis · Risks · Arguments
WHY THIS MONEY IS BEING SPENT
WHY WAS THIS FUNDED?
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), which is part of the Department of Transportation, is responsible by law for the safety of the national airspace, and this contract supports the technology systems that air traffic controllers rely on every day. Additional program information about the specific legal authority is not available.
WHAT PUBLIC PROBLEM IS IT TRYING TO SOLVE?
Air traffic controllers at busy airports need accurate, real-time data about flights, including arrivals, departures, and aircraft positions, to safely guide planes and prevent accidents. This system helps make sure that information is collected, managed, and delivered reliably.
WHO BENEFITS?
The primary beneficiaries are air traffic controllers at U.S. airports, who use this data to manage flights safely. Indirectly, all airline passengers and the aviation industry benefit from the improved safety and efficiency this system supports.
Plain-language reading generated from the USASpending award record. Not legal or financial advice.
RISKS AND TRADEOFFS
WHAT ARE THE RISKS?
Given the long contract period of roughly 12 years and the large dollar amount, there is a risk that costs could grow beyond original estimates or that the technology could become outdated before the contract ends. Oversight is important to ensure the system continues to meet FAA safety standards throughout the contract.
WHAT HAPPENS IF FUNDING IS REMOVED?
If this contract were cancelled, air traffic controllers could lose access to the data management tools they depend on to safely guide aircraft, potentially creating safety gaps at U.S. airports. The FAA would need to quickly find a replacement solution, which could be costly and time-consuming.
FOR AND AGAINST
ARGUMENTS FOR
- •Aviation safety is a core government responsibility, and maintaining reliable flight data systems directly protects the lives of passengers and crew on thousands of daily flights.
- •A long-term contract with a single experienced provider can create consistency and reduce the disruptions that come from frequently switching technology vendors in a safety-critical environment.
- •Investing in modern flight data management can improve efficiency at airports, reducing delays and saving airlines and travelers time and money.
ARGUMENTS AGAINST
- •A 12-year, $574 million contract with one company limits competition and could reduce the government's ability to get better pricing or switch to newer technology as it becomes available.
- •The contract type is listed as unknown, which makes it difficult for the public and oversight bodies to assess whether taxpayer money is being spent as efficiently as possible.
- •Long-term, single-vendor technology contracts in government have a history of cost overruns and delays, raising concerns about whether the final cost will stay near the original estimate.
SPENDING TIMELINE
Add a tag
Written opinion on whether this spending is appropriate · not a duplicate of the Worth It / Wasteful vote or spending record. Similar opinions on this spending record can open a solution poll.
3 similar opinions open a solution poll
Loading opinions
Your stance is citizen opinion; it does not form a citizen mandate. Mandate accountability applies when Congress votes on tracked legislation.